THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES

527 indexed citations
published 1957
Journal
Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1139/o57-080 →

Countries where authors are citing THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES more than expected).

Fields of papers citing THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES.

About THE REASON FOR THE SHAPE OF THE DISTENSIBILITY CURVES OF ARTERIES

This paper, published in 1957, received 527 indexed citations . Written by Margot R. Roach and Alan C. Burton covering the research area of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (250 citations), Surgery (193 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (184 citations). Published in Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1139/o57-080.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026