A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination
- Authors
- William Y. B. Chang
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1139/f82-158 →Countries where authors are citing A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination
This map shows the geographic impact of A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination
This network shows the impact of A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination.
About A Statistical Method for Evaluating the Reproducibility of Age Determination
This paper, published in 1982, received 691 indexed citations . Written by William Y. B. Chang. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (530 citations), Global and Planetary Change (530 citations) and Aquatic Science (380 citations). Published in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1139/f82-158.