Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach

426 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 426 indexed citations. Written by Ming Cao, A. Stephen Morse and Brian D. O. Anderson covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (393 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (65 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (55 citations). Published in SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization.

Countries where authors are citing Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: A Graphical Approach.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1137/060657005.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026