Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1137/0325086 →Countries where authors are citing Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon
This map shows the geographic impact of Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon
This network shows the impact of Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon.
About Optimal Portfolio and Consumption Decisions for a “Small Investor” on a Finite Horizon
This paper, published in 1987, received 709 indexed citations . Written by Ioannis Karatzas, John P. Lehoczky and Steven E. Shreve covering the research area of Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Finance (624 citations), Economics and Econometrics (474 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (211 citations). Published in SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1137/0325086.