Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch
- Journal
- Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8530 →Countries where authors are citing Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch
This map shows the geographic impact of Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch
This network shows the impact of Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch.
About Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch
This paper, published in 2020, received 308 indexed citations . Written by Won‐Jae Joo, Jisoo Kyoung, Majid Esfandyarpour, Sung‐Hoon Lee, Hyun Cheol Koo, Sunjin Song, Young‐Nam Kwon, Seok Ho Song, Jun Cheol Bae and Ara Jo covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (146 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (134 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (94 citations), Biomedical Engineering (87 citations) and Materials Chemistry (73 citations). Published in Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.abc8530.