Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating
- Journal
- Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0940 →Countries where authors are citing Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating
This map shows the geographic impact of Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating
This network shows the impact of Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating.
About Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating
This paper, published in 2015, received 588 indexed citations . Written by Fernando Paolo, H. A. Fricker and Laurie Padman covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Atmospheric Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (547 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (237 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (113 citations). Published in Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0940.