Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation

483 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1981, received 483 indexed citations. Written by Andrew H.‐J. Wang, Gary J. Quigley, Francis J. Kolpak, Jacques H. van Boom and Alexander Rich covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (454 citations), Ecology (44 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (44 citations). Published in Science.

Countries where authors are citing Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Left-Handed Double Helical DNA: Variations in the Backbone Conformation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/science.7444458.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026