The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics
- Journal
- Science Advances
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl4183 →Countries where authors are citing The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics
This map shows the geographic impact of The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics
This network shows the impact of The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics.
About The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics
This paper, published in 2022, received 154 indexed citations . Written by Aaron Bernstein, Amy W. Ando, Ted Temzelides, Mariana M. Vale, Binbin V. Li, Hongying Li, Jonah Busch, Colin A. Chapman, Margaret F. Kinnaird and Katarzyna Nowak covering the research area of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (103 citations), Infectious Diseases (61 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (53 citations). Published in Science Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl4183.