Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 235 indexed citations. Written by Zhaoyi Li, Peng Lin, Yao‐Wei Huang, Joon‐Suh Park, Wei Ting Chen, Zhujun Shi, Cheng‐Wei Qiu, Ji‐Xin Cheng and Federico Capasso covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (187 citations), Aerospace Engineering (97 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (90 citations). Published in Science Advances.

Countries where authors are citing Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Meta-optics achieves RGB-achromatic focusing for virtual reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4458.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026