U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s
- Journal
- Science Advances
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc0020 →Countries where authors are citing U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s
This map shows the geographic impact of U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s more than expected).
Fields of papers citing U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s
This network shows the impact of U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s.
About U.S. fires became larger, more frequent, and more widespread in the 2000s
This paper, published in 2022, received 159 indexed citations . Written by Virginia Iglesias, Jennifer K. Balch and William R. Travis covering the research area of Atmospheric Science, Sociology and Political Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (129 citations), Atmospheric Science (38 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (32 citations). Published in Science Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc0020.