Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids
- Authors
- H. J. McSkimin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1121/1.1908386 →Countries where authors are citing Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids
This map shows the geographic impact of Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids
This network shows the impact of Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids.
About Pulse Superposition Method for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Solids
This paper, published in 1961, received 497 indexed citations . Written by H. J. McSkimin covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (240 citations), Geophysics (176 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (142 citations). Published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1121/1.1908386.