Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane
- Journal
- The Journal of Physiology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014257 →Countries where authors are citing Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane
This map shows the geographic impact of Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane
This network shows the impact of Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane.
About Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane
This paper, published in 1982, received 432 indexed citations . Written by Kazuo Kusano, Ricardo Miledi and J. Stinnakre covering the research area of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Animal Science and Zoology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (324 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (276 citations) and Social Psychology (77 citations). Published in The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014257.