Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses
- Journal
- World Economy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/twec.12189 →Countries where authors are citing Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses
This map shows the geographic impact of Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses
This network shows the impact of Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses.
About Supply‐chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses
This paper, published in 2014, received 507 indexed citations . Written by Richard Baldwin and Javier López-González covering the research area of Strategy and Management and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (354 citations), Strategy and Management (316 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (259 citations). Published in World Economy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/twec.12189.