Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 472 indexed citations. Written by Jianqing Fan, Yuan Liao and Martina Mincheva covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (235 citations), Economics and Econometrics (185 citations) and Finance (180 citations). Published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology).

Countries where authors are citing Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12016.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026