How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses

639 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 639 indexed citations. Written by Sanna Sevanto, Nate G. McDowell, L. Turin Dickman, Robert E. Pangle and William T. Pockman covering the research area of Plant Science, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (541 citations), Atmospheric Science (298 citations) and Plant Science (286 citations). Published in Plant Cell & Environment.

Countries where authors are citing How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/pce.12141.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026