Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning
- Journal
- Modern Language Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302 →Countries where authors are citing Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning
This map shows the geographic impact of Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning
This network shows the impact of Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning.
About Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning
This paper, published in 2016, received 282 indexed citations . Written by Dorothy M. Chun, Richard A. Kern and Bryan Smith covering the research area of Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction and Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (137 citations), Information Systems (98 citations) and Language and Linguistics (87 citations). Published in Modern Language Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302.