ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15331 →Countries where authors are citing ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats
This map shows the geographic impact of ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats more than expected).
Fields of papers citing ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats
This network shows the impact of ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ACVIM consensus statement: Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15331.