Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2020, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Mariano Sanz, David Herrera, Moritz Kebschull, Iain Chapple, Søren Jepsen, Tord Berglundh, Anton Sculean and Maurizio S. Tonetti covering the research area of Periodontics and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Periodontics (832 citations), Oral Surgery (349 citations) and Urology (198 citations). Published in Journal Of Clinical Periodontology.

Countries where authors are citing Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Treatment of stage I–III periodontitis—The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13290.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026