Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research
- Authors
- Katherine SiegelLaura E. Dee
- Journal
- Ecology Letters
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/ele.70053 →Countries where authors are citing Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research
This map shows the geographic impact of Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research
This network shows the impact of Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research.
About Foundations and Future Directions for Causal Inference in Ecological Research
This paper, published in 2025, received 15 indexed citations . Written by Katherine Siegel and Laura E. Dee covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (5 citations), Global and Planetary Change (5 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3 citations). Published in Ecology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/ele.70053.