Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks

263 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 263 indexed citations. Written by Paul J. CaraDonna, William K. Petry, J L Cunningham, Judith L. Bronstein, Nickolas M. Waser and Nathan J. Sanders covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (244 citations), Plant Science (159 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (152 citations). Published in Ecology Letters.

Countries where authors are citing Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/ele.12740.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026