V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants
- Journal
- Ecography
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04434 →Countries where authors are citing V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants
This map shows the geographic impact of V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants more than expected).
Fields of papers citing V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants
This network shows the impact of V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants.
About V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants
This paper, published in 2019, received 750 indexed citations . Written by Yi Jin and Hong Qian covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (548 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (458 citations) and Plant Science (262 citations). Published in Ecography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04434.