How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies
- Authors
- Ellen A. NøhrZeyan Liew
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13319 →Countries where authors are citing How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies
This map shows the geographic impact of How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies
This network shows the impact of How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.
About How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies
This paper, published in 2018, received 221 indexed citations . Written by Ellen A. Nøhr and Zeyan Liew covering the research area of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics and Probability and Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (49 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (40 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (34 citations). Published in Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13319.