MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 496 indexed citations. Written by Yixin Chen, Jinbo Bi and James Z. Wang covering the research area of Signal Processing and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (419 citations), Artificial Intelligence (193 citations) and Media Technology (73 citations). Published in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Countries where authors are citing MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection more than expected).

Fields of papers citing MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the MILES: Multiple-Instance Learning via Embedded Instance Selection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2006.248.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026