Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 532 indexed citations. Written by Huiji Gao, Geoffrey Barbier and Rebecca Goolsby covering the research area of Communication, Epidemiology and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Communication (233 citations), Sociology and Political Science (223 citations) and Computer Science Applications (97 citations). Published in IEEE Intelligent Systems.

Countries where authors are citing Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/mis.2011.52.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026