A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast

417 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 417 indexed citations. Written by John W. Byers, Michael Luby and Michael Mitzenmacher covering the research area of Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (377 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (245 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (49 citations). Published in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

Countries where authors are citing A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A digital fountain approach to asynchronous reliable multicast.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2002.803996.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026