Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era

1.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by Chen Sun, Abhinav Shrivastava, Saurabh Singh and Abhinav Gupta covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (594 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (584 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations). Published in .

Countries where authors are citing Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2017.97.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026