What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?

315 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 315 indexed citations. Written by Qi Wu, Chunhua Shen, Lingqiao Liu, Anthony Dick and Anton van den Hengel covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (308 citations), Artificial Intelligence (156 citations) and Media Technology (3 citations). Published in Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).

Countries where authors are citing What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What Value Do Explicit High Level Concepts Have in Vision to Language Problems?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2016.29.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026