A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation

983 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 983 indexed citations. Written by Lai-Man Po covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (949 citations), Signal Processing (844 citations) and Media Technology (17 citations). Published in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

Countries where authors are citing A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A novel four-step search algorithm for fast block motion estimation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/76.499840.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026