Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods

823 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 823 indexed citations. Written by Bernhard Schölkopf, Mika Sirén, Christopher J. C. Burges, K. Müller, Gunnar Rätsch and Alexander J. Smola covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (414 citations), Artificial Intelligence (377 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (158 citations). Published in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

Countries where authors are citing Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/72.788641.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026