Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding)

630 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1988, received 630 indexed citations. Written by Y. Shoham and A. Gersho covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (561 citations), Signal Processing (399 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (75 citations). Published in IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1109/29.90373 →

Countries where authors are citing Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding)

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding) more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding)

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Efficient bit allocation for an arbitrary set of quantizers (speech coding).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1109/29.90373.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026