Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity
- Journal
- The American Naturalist
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/650372 →Countries where authors are citing Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity
This map shows the geographic impact of Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity
This network shows the impact of Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity.
About Large‐Scale Diversification of Skull Shape in Domestic Dogs: Disparity and Modularity
This paper, published in 2010, received 317 indexed citations . Written by Abby Grace Drake and Christian Peter Klingenberg covering the research area of Paleontology, Anthropology and Geometry and Topology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geometry and Topology (204 citations), Paleontology (147 citations) and Genetics (109 citations). Published in The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/650372.