Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices
- Journal
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/647952 →Countries where authors are citing Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices
This map shows the geographic impact of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices
This network shows the impact of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices.
About Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices
This paper, published in 2009, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by James H. Jorgensen and Mary Jane Ferraro covering the research area of Molecular Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Biochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Biochemistry (486 citations), Molecular Medicine (314 citations) and Molecular Biology (279 citations). Published in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/647952.