Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection
- Journal
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/516778 →Countries where authors are citing Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection
This map shows the geographic impact of Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection
This network shows the impact of Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection.
About Retention in Care: A Challenge to Survival with HIV Infection
This paper, published in 2007, received 472 indexed citations . Written by Thomas P. Giordano, Allen L. Gifford, A. Clinton White, Linda Rabeneck, Christine Hartman, Lisa I. Backus, L Molé and Robert O. Morgan covering the research area of Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (443 citations), Epidemiology (323 citations) and General Health Professions (132 citations). Published in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/516778.