Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation
- Journal
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/409470 →Countries where authors are citing Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation
This map shows the geographic impact of Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation
This network shows the impact of Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation.
About Cost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation
This paper, published in 1976, received 890 indexed citations . Written by Raymond B. Huey and Montgomery Slatkin covering the research area of Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (620 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (533 citations) and Ecology (459 citations). Published in The Quarterly Review of Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/409470.