Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany
- Authors
- Ruud KoopmansSusan Olzak
- Journal
- American Journal of Sociology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/386271 →Countries where authors are citing Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany
This map shows the geographic impact of Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany
This network shows the impact of Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany.
About Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany
This paper, published in 2004, received 399 indexed citations . Written by Ruud Koopmans and Susan Olzak covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (276 citations), Political Science and International Relations (180 citations) and Communication (87 citations). Published in American Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/386271.