Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics

605 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 605 indexed citations. Written by T. Rauscher, Alexander Heger, R. D. Hoffman and S. E. Woosley covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (467 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (321 citations) and Radiation (77 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1086/341728 →

Countries where authors are citing Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/341728.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026