The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by Scott Tremaine, Karl Gebhardt, R. Bender, Gary Bower, Alan Dressler, S. M. Faber, A. V. Filippenko, Richard F. Green, Carl J. Grillmair and Luis C. Ho covering the research area of Instrumentation and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k citations), Instrumentation (456 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (345 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1086/341002 →

Countries where authors are citing The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/341002.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026