The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 589 indexed citations. Written by Stephen V. Cameron and James J. Heckman covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (288 citations), Sociology and Political Science (283 citations) and Education (278 citations). Published in Journal of Political Economy.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1086/321014 →

Countries where authors are citing The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Dynamics of Educational Attainment for Black, Hispanic, and White Males.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/321014.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026