The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/308692 →Countries where authors are citing The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
This map shows the geographic impact of The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
This network shows the impact of The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies.
About The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
This paper, published in 2000, received 3.0k indexed citations . Written by Daniela Calzetti, L. Armus, R. C. Bohlin, Anne L. Kinney, J. Koornneef and Thaisa Storchi‐Bergmann covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (3.0k citations), Instrumentation (1.6k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (298 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/308692.