A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/305002 →Countries where authors are citing A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs
This map shows the geographic impact of A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs
This network shows the impact of A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs.
About A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs
This paper, published in 1997, received 763 indexed citations . Written by Adam Burrows, Mark S. Marley, W. B. Hubbard, J. I. Lunine, T. Guillot, D. Saumon, Richard Freedman, D. Sudarsky and C. Sharp covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (731 citations), Instrumentation (214 citations) and Spectroscopy (65 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/305002.