Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism
- Authors
- Michael L. Rosenzweig
- Journal
- The American Naturalist
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/285137 →Countries where authors are citing Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism
This map shows the geographic impact of Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism
This network shows the impact of Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism.
About Habitat Selection and Population Interactions: The Search for Mechanism
This paper, published in 1991, received 553 indexed citations . Written by Michael L. Rosenzweig covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (393 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (289 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (169 citations). Published in The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/285137.