Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance
- Authors
- Nathan L. Stephenson
- Journal
- The American Naturalist
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/285067 →Countries where authors are citing Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance
This map shows the geographic impact of Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance
This network shows the impact of Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance.
About Climatic Control of Vegetation Distribution: The Role of the Water Balance
This paper, published in 1990, received 654 indexed citations . Written by Nathan L. Stephenson covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (446 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (294 citations) and Atmospheric Science (213 citations). Published in The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/285067.