Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations
- Authors
- Russell Lande
- Journal
- The American Naturalist
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/284734 →Countries where authors are citing Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations
This map shows the geographic impact of Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations
This network shows the impact of Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations.
About Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations
This paper, published in 1987, received 448 indexed citations . Written by Russell Lande covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (272 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (255 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (108 citations). Published in The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/284734.