Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

1.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1955, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by John C. Harsanyi covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (708 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (297 citations) and General Decision Sciences (289 citations). Published in Journal of Political Economy.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1086/257678 →

Countries where authors are citing Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/257678.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026