Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence
- Authors
- Peter GoldreichS. Sridhar
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/175121 →Countries where authors are citing Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence
This map shows the geographic impact of Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence
This network shows the impact of Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence.
About Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Peter Goldreich and S. Sridhar covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.4k citations), Molecular Biology (360 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (333 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/175121.