The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/170498 →Countries where authors are citing The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines
This map shows the geographic impact of The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines
This network shows the impact of The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines.
About The analysis of apparent optical depth profiles for interstellar absorption lines
This paper, published in 1991, received 466 indexed citations . Written by Blair D. Savage and Kenneth R. Sembach covering the research area of Mechanics of Materials, Aerospace Engineering and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (454 citations), Instrumentation (56 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (42 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/170498.