Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/155692 →Countries where authors are citing Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
This map shows the geographic impact of Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
This network shows the impact of Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution.
About Interstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
This paper, published in 1977, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Richard McCray, J. Castor, Paul R. Shapiro and R. L. Moore covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.0k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (307 citations) and Instrumentation (61 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/155692.