LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment
- Authors
- Matthew G. Rollins
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1071/wf08088 →Countries where authors are citing LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment
This map shows the geographic impact of LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment
This network shows the impact of LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment.
About LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment
This paper, published in 2009, received 515 indexed citations . Written by Matthew G. Rollins covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (453 citations), Ecology (286 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (139 citations). Published in International Journal of Wildland Fire.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1071/wf08088.