Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment
- Journal
- Soil Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1071/sr10058 →Countries where authors are citing Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment
This map shows the geographic impact of Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment
This network shows the impact of Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment.
About Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment
This paper, published in 2010, received 772 indexed citations . Written by Balwant Singh, Bhupinder Pal Singh and Annette Cowie covering the research area of Soil Science, Pollution and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Soil Science (377 citations), Biomaterials (203 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (173 citations). Published in Soil Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1071/sr10058.