Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants
- Journal
- Functional Plant Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1071/pp9920519 →Countries where authors are citing Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants
This map shows the geographic impact of Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants
This network shows the impact of Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants.
About Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants
This paper, published in 1992, received 990 indexed citations . Written by Miquel Ribas‐Carbó and Joseph A. Berry covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (870 citations), Plant Science (314 citations) and Atmospheric Science (238 citations). Published in Functional Plant Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1071/pp9920519.